Free Newsletters - Space News - Defense Alert - Environment Report - Energy Monitor
. Nuclear Energy News .




CIVIL NUCLEAR
U.S. nuclear energy safety questioned
by Linyi Zhang, Medill News Service
Washington (UPI) Nov 1, 2012


disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only

The United States is headed toward a major nuclear disaster -- one that could mirror what happened last year in Japan -- unless the government more closely monitors aging power plants, safety advocates and activists said.

"This is like the Titanic that is headed toward an iceberg," said Paul Gunter, the co-founder of the Clamshell Alliance anti-nuclear group and a longtime activist.

Gunter's concern centers on the 23 "Mark I" nuclear reactors in the United States, which are identical to the containment vessels used at Fukushima's Daiichi nuclear power plant, where three reactors failed and went into meltdown in 2011.

With more frequent extreme weather events like Hurricane Sandy predicted, whether the facilities, which dot the landscape from New Jersey to Nebraska, could withstand a disaster as forceful as the tsunami in Japan remains unclear.

"Our facilities are responding extremely well," said Steve Kerekes, spokesman of the Nuclear Energy Institute, a policy organization of the nuclear energy said after Hurricane Sandy hit the U.S. East Coast.

He expressed no concerns over the weather challenges faced by aging reactors., saying records showed the facilities in the United States have operated safely in extreme weather.

But some experts said they fear that a nuclear disaster is unfolding in the country.

The small containment leaves Mark I reactor -- the earliest model designed by General Electric Co. -- not as robust as later designs, said Margaret Harding, an independent nuclear consultant who worked for General Electric for 27 years.

Gunter said he worries that the parallels to Japan are too similar to ignore, noting the strain the reactors could be under when there are severe weather conditions.

Tuesday's historic hurricane brought the issue into sharp focus as Oyster Creek nuclear station -- one of the oldest nuclear plants adjacent to the Oyster Creek in New Jersey using Mark I boiling water reactor -- declared an alert because of high water levels. The plant experienced power disruption but backup diesel fuel was able to provide power for cooling.

But experts said if future events become more severe, under-designed protections might fail.

If operators aren't able to connect temporary equipment in flooding, "there's another nuclear disaster," said Dave Lochbaum, director of the nuclear safety program of Union of Concerned Scientists, a nuclear oversight group.

Earlier this month, an un-redacted version of a recently released Nuclear Regulatory Commission report made its way to Greenpeace, the environmental group that couples the Mark 1 safety issues with a concern about geographic adjacencies. The report highlights the threat the NRC sees to power plants close to waterways, especially large dams.

All 23 Mark I reactors are adjacent to waters, some with major cities that have populations in the millions in the potential radioactive contamination zone. Gunter said waves generated by severe weather or a succession of dam breaks could be higher than the water wall caused by the tsunami and lead to a similar station blackout in Japan.

An earthquake April 11, 2011, created a tsunami that struck the Fukushima nuclear power plant and caused a loss of all power at the facility, imperiling the plant's capability to cool down the overheated core.

"Fukushima demonstrated that you can't be without power for a long time," said Gunter, who is also director of Beyond Nuclear, a non-profit in Takoma Park, Md. "But when these [backup] diesel generators are damaged, or the fuels are contaminated, there is very short time before the core damage occurs. It relies on a robust containment, which Mark I doesn't have."

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairwoman Allison Macfarlane said last week at a nuclear safety presentation that the United States is working to better prepare for station blackout and other events triggered by extreme weather.

John Lee, nuclear engineering professor at University of Michigan, said that despite the vulnerable containment, the safety measures in place would make sure Mark I reactors in the United States can survive natural disasters similar to the Fukushima tsunami.

However, a report conducted by Union of Concerned Scientists said the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ignores weaknesses in protection regulations. It allows 27 reactors to operate facing earthquakes larger than they are designed to withstand, 47 reactors violating fire protection regulations, including one Mark I plant.

"As long as luck prevents those vulnerabilities from being challenged, it's fine," Lochbaum said. "But if luck runs out, those pre-existing conditions can mean disaster."

.


Related Links
Nuclear Power News - Nuclear Science, Nuclear Technology
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle




Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News





CIVIL NUCLEAR
Bulgarian president sets nuclear referendum for next January
Sofia (AFP) Oct 31, 2012
Bulgarians will be asked in a January referendum whether they want their country to be home to a second nuclear power plant, the office of President Rosen Plevneliev said Wednesday. In a statement, his office said the national poll would take place on January 27, 2013. "The question: should Bulgaria develop nuclear energy through building a new nuclear power plant?" the statement said. ... read more


CIVIL NUCLEAR
Biofuel breakthrough: Quick cook method turns algae into oil

Switching to an energy crop: Break even or make a profit?

New enzyme 'produces more fuel from less corn,' Danish company says

Scientists build 'nanobowls' to protect catalysts needed for better biofuel production

CIVIL NUCLEAR
Stanford scientists build the first all-carbon solar cell

China probes EU solar imports

Tokelau achieves renewable power

Next-generation antireflection coatings could improve solar photovoltaic cell efficiency

CIVIL NUCLEAR
China backs suit against Obama over wind farm deal

DNV KEMA awarded framework agreement for German wind project developer SoWiTec

Sandia Labs benchmark helps wind industry measure success

Bigger wind turbines make greener electricity

CIVIL NUCLEAR
Sustainable cities must look beyond city limits

Outside View: Energy companies' taxes

Virgin Group and Rosnano announce joint investment fund

Efforts to mitigate climate change must target energy efficiency

CIVIL NUCLEAR
The hunt for electron holes

Maurel Prom reveals approach for Gabon oil assets, report names suitor Sinopec

Iraq, Kuwait battle over gulf megaports

BG Group says it sells Queensland gas interests to China's CNOOC

CIVIL NUCLEAR
Physicists confirm first planet discovered in a quadruple star system

Planet-hunt data released to public

New Study Brings a Doubted Exoplanet 'Back from the Dead'

New small satellite will study super-Earths for ESA

CIVIL NUCLEAR
Philippines to get five French patrol boats

BAE says wins further submarine design contract

U.S. 'mulls buying Israeli robot gunboats'

UK Ministry of Defence awards Raytheon new Phalanx contract

CIVIL NUCLEAR
Curiosity's Tastes of Martian Soil Offer Insights on Mineral Composition

NASA Rover's First Soil Studies Help Fingerprint Martian Minerals

Curiosity on Mars sits on rocks similar to those found in marshes in Mexico

Continuing Work With Scoops at 'Rocknest'




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement